That’s why behavioral economics can be so useful in tackling pernicious health problems. It allows us to preserve people’s ...

Scholars reflect on the continuing impact of the No Surprises Act.

The Supreme Court validates political control over public health decisions.

The Supreme Court weighs public safety concerns surrounding ghost guns in recent Second Amendment decision.

The Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision on FDA’s tobacco-authorization authority is utterly unremarkable.

It is time we introduce “Humanity’s Best Exam”—a benchmark that strives to capture a model’s capacity to address public ...

Kennedy, a case that concerns how hospitals that treat a large share of low-income patients are paid by the Medicare program.

The Supreme Court preserves preventive services coverage but emboldens the HHS Secretary.

The Supreme Court allows Department of Education layoffs, a federal court upholds a mifepristone ban, and ...

Scholars and practitioners examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

Lawrence O. Gostin discusses the importance of equity and science in the face of threats to global health security.

When a project like the rail line has significant environmental impacts, NEPA requires a “detailed statement” that discusses the project’s negative environmental effects and reasonable alternatives.