Being constantly on defense over trumped-up negatives, whether on this topic or on immigration, gender identity, health care, ...

Director of the National Institutes of Health says that capping research journals’ open-access fees will help rein in the $19 ...

The Trump administration has terminated millions worth of funding for Springer Nature, a German-owned scientific publishing giant that has long received payments for subscriptions from National ...

The negative impact on research quality and innovation would be devastating. Government control over scientific publishing ...

The National Institutes of Health announced it will put a limit on publisher fees for publicly funded research by Fiscal Year ...

Publishing peer review files at Nature has been optional since 2020; starting Monday, it is now automatic.

Public trust in scientific integrity is eroded by the politicisation of institutions under Donald Trump's US presidency. The implications extend far beyond American borders, striking at the core of ...

SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING has long been a money-printing operation, with many big publishing houses reporting profit margins of between 30% and 40% year after year. The long-standing business model is ...

The administration of US President Donald Trump has cut some government agencies’ subscriptions to journals at Nature ’s ...

The proponents of open access argued that making research freely available to everyone would accelerate scientific advancement, spur innovation, and make academic publishing more equitable.

Generative AI is boosting production of fake scientific papers. How are journal publishers adjusting to this new reality?

A few publishers have already taken this step, and although only time will tell if it succeeds, the practice does appear to blunt the argument that too much scientific work is hashed out behind ...