Trump Tariffs Case at Supreme Court Today
Digest more
The Supreme Court‘s Wednesday oral arguments over the legality of Donald Trump‘s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs pitted the president’s constitutional foreign affairs powers against Congress’s constitutionally delegated tariff power.
SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Verbs, verbs, verbs.
Next year, the Supreme Court will decide whether the President can use a five decade old emergency powers act to shape the U.S. economy.Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or AYEEPA,
21hon MSNOpinion
Trump’s weaponizing of ‘emergency’ label comes to a head
The president continues to use this once-narrow exception for genuine crises as a routine pretext for government overreach.
Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism about Donald Trump's use of emergency law to impose global tariffs during oral arguments Wednesday.
What to know about the case that could rein in Trump’s sweeping concept of presidential power — or endorse it.
1don MSNOpinion
A good day for the separation of powers in the Supreme Court
After oral arguments it appears the Supreme Court will strike down President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs 6-3.
16hon MSNOpinion
'Emergency' Has Become Washington's Favorite Loophole. It's Cost Taxpayers $15 Trillion.
What was once meant to be a narrow exception for genuine crises has become a routine pretext for government overreach.
In times of national emergency, should the Supreme Court dictate America's grand strategy and international economic policies? This question confronts